Make this a memory of the past!

At Supplyant, we were on the hunt for backup and disaster recovery software, and came across Protexia’s service.  

The company are based in Sheffield, and one of the things that initially attracted us was the affordability of the service. Protexia state that their ethos “centres on offering exemplary quality while maintaining market leading prices,” – market leading prices indeed!

Their best offer is a whole 1TB – that’s 1000GB – of storage for just £50 a month. Other cheaper offers are available, and include:

• 100GB for just £ 10 per month
• 250GB for just £ 20 per month
• 500GB for just £ 30 per month

I checked over a whole host of other providers, Mozy, Acronis and others, but they were just too complicated – and too expensive. On average they were going to charge me £50 a month for just 100GB of storage.

With Protexia, I can get 10 times the amount of storage for the same price!

Simon Morton, Managing Director, Supplyant

Protexia also offer a FREE 30 day trial to allow business users to experience the benefits for themselves.

After only five minutes playing around with the software, the straightforward interface ensured we found it remarkably easy to use. Protexia is also quite secure, allowing the user to set their own encryption key – meaning only the owner can access their files.

If you are looking for a robust backup and disaster recovery software, go check out Protexia today!

Hows It Work?
AB testing allows you to show visitors to your site different versions of a page. Tracking software can follow the customers journey through the site see what works better.  Its easier to understand with an example so see what happened below:

The BathEmpire Sale Test

A client, Bath Empire, recently launched an amazing sale on the site and the team had  a few ideas over how we should present the savings. Rather than arguing between us which was best we ran a test to see which one worked better for our customers.

In the test we measured:

• Engagement – when people visit the page do they click another link on the page or hit the back button
• Visit Product Page – how many people visit a product page based on the 3 layouts
• Get to Shopping Cart – of these people how  many get to the shopping basket.

Which variation do you think would win?

Be honest, which one would you choose? How big an effect do you think this small change might have had? Our straw poll in the office showed the strike through version (variation 2) was most peoples top tip for winning all categories. As it clearly showed the savings and followed a convention that many other shops online were using.

What did win?

In our test variation 1 was a clear winner, removing the RRP all together had the following effect over the original:

Engage on page:

19% more people interacted with the page

Click through to a product:

80% more people clicked through to a product

Into shopping basket:

377% more people went through to shopping basket

Why?

This was a fairly small test, but my thought is that the winner was down to a less is more approach. By keeping only the key facts in view it reduced confusion working out which was the best deal.

What do you think, I’d love to hear your comments.

Simon…

Visit the LO Suspension Site